Had the fever pitch anxiety about four day meat ban in deference
to Jain community’s Pratyushan, remained
confined to TV anchors and the handpicked chatterati that appear on TV debates
one would have ignored it as another passing storm in a tea-cup. But when someone with the gravitas of Pratap
Bhanu Mehta declares with righteous rage, "Get off the ban-wagon! Meat
bans violate fundamental liberties, erode state’s secular character"(The Indian Express, September 13, 2015), it
becomes necessary to ask why is it that our intellectual elite have never
before felt outraged at far more draconian bans with far more deadly outcomes?
Of the numerous examples of double standards in this regard that
one could offer, let me just cite just one for reasons of space. "Ban the
Ban" enthusiasts don't seem to care that since late 1990s animal rights
zealots succeeded in banning the traditional art and occupations of all those
communities in India that specialized in training animals for art performances
as a means of livelihood. There was a
time when snake charmers and bazigars would be sent to international
festivals as ambassadors of India's traditional art forms. But when the
Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 was extended to these communities it reduced
them to the status of outlaws. With one stroke of pen their centuries old art
forms came to be treated as criminal activity without even bothering to provide
them any alternative means of survival. The
Madaris who trained monkeys or bears,
the Saperas that tamed and made snakes
dance to the tune of traditional musical instruments like the Been,
are today among the most marginalized and brutalized social groups in India.
Those who tried keeping alive their inherited art are sent to jail and have
their animals or reptiles confiscated. Nobody even thought of employing them in
zoological gardens, or putting their centuries honed knowledge of the forests,
medicinal plants and wild life to creative use in modern occupations.
Even the Nats who specialize in acrobatic performances had their
art form banned under anti-beggary law. In the process of providing legal help
to several such families who had their children snatched away by the police while
the adults were locked up on the charge of “begging” while all they were doing
is to earn money by displaying their unique art form, I witnessed from very
close how pious sounding laws have been used to inflict legal terrorism on
these hapless groups.
If putting animals in a zoo is not "cruelty", how can a Madari
training a monkey to dance and entertain be called cruelty? If slaughtering
animals for food is not a crime, how can we treat Saperas and Madaris
as criminals for having preserved their ancestrally inherited art forms
involving animals? Animal rights activists dare not demand a ban on animal
slaughter for meat eating because the elite sections of society get outraged at
the slightest restrictions on their lifestyles.
But when Madaris and Saperas were banned from practicing
their centuries old traditional art, not a voice of protest rose in their
defence, not a tear has been shed for their plight because the ban impacted
only the poorest of the poor.
It is noteworthy that the Indian Constitution (Articles 25 to 28)
allows every community to practice and preserve its traditional culture. Thus, the ban on Saperas and Madaris
is not only an assault on their constitutionally guaranteed "freedom of
occupation" but also to their fundamental right to preserve their
millennia old culture.
I don't know if monkeys, bears and snakes "rescued" from
these groups have remembered to send their thank you notes to Maneka Gandhi who
takes the credit for having imposed and implemented this ban with ferocious
zeal and determination. But in every
basti of Madaris and Saperas, one hears people curse her for
having destroyed their means of livelihood, their knowledge tradition and reduced
them to beggary. We the elite remember the otherwise banned Saperas
whenever snakes suddenly appear in our homes or offices and poses a threat to our
lives. They were put on duty even at the
time of Common Wealth Games because the area cleared for building CWG village
on the banks of Yamuna was a natural habitat for reptiles. But ordinary Indians
still call Saperas to their homes for ritual pujas on Nag Panchami. But even that is outlawed as per Maneka
Gandhi's farmaans.
Today, these tyrannized communities’ spread all over India, live
in utter penury. Even if you can't go
witness their plight in villages of India, I urge you to have a glimpse at their
wretched conditions in Kathputli Colony near Shadipur Depot or Sapera Basti
near Badarpur border.
Now that the threat of curbs on porn sites & meat deprivation
for couple of days, has awakened our intellectual elite to the evil effects of
bans, may one expect that they will lend support to MANUSHI’s endeavors to get
the above described ban also lifted?
First published in The Indian Express September 24, 2015: (http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/the-selective-outrage-over-bans/)
You have that rare skill of seeing beyond smoke and mirrors and other deceptions. The clarity of your thoughts is reflected in the clarity of your writing. Thank you for staying with it all, and for continuing to raise your voice.
ReplyDeleteYr article is very informative and an eye opener . This needs prime time TV coverage and wide publicity so that these hapless people once again get back their traditional livelihoods and we don't lose our customary knowledge base .
ReplyDeleteDear Madhuji,
ReplyDeleteThis sense of justness you have shown in the article is admirable. Though I work on environmental issues, but I have been wondering how these tamed animals are worse off than those in zoo, or even worse than those slaughtered.
The condition of the saperas, nats is truly deplorable due to the new laws, which we formed with no consultation and consideration for these communities as if these are not part of the India.
The meat ban at least brought death to these animals to halt for some days - it can not be called a negative step. But those crying hoarse over it have some political thinking definitely.